{"id":10362,"date":"2024-04-11T22:55:22","date_gmt":"2024-04-11T22:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=10362"},"modified":"2024-04-24T11:01:03","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T11:01:03","slug":"explain-it-to-me-non-partisan-act-10-research-good-for-kids-good-for-high-performing-teachers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=10362","title":{"rendered":"EXPLAIN IT TO ME: Non-Partisan Act 10 Research: Good for Kids, Good for High-Performing Teachers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at <a href=\"https:\/\/reforminggovernment.org\/explain-it-to-me-non-partisan-act-10-research-good-for-kids-good-for-high-performing-teachers\/\">https:\/\/reforminggovernment.org\/explain-it-to-me-non-partisan-act-10-research-good-for-kids-good-for-high-performing-teachers\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Explain It to Me: Non-Partisan Act 10 Research: Good for Kids, Good for High-Performing Teachers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Research Paper Awarded Prestigious American Economic Association Prize<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>What Happened<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>2011 Act 10, which changed bargaining rights for public-sector unions and contributions to benefits for employees, remains 1 of the most significant and debated pieces of legislation in 50 years.<\/p>\n<p>However, rigorous, non-partisan analysis of the reform was nowhere to be found\u2026until recently! Professor Barbara Biasi of the Yale School of Management published a 2021 paper that just won a major award from the American Economic Association. The paper compares districts that used Act 10 to pay teachers as individuals against districts that continued to use uniform union pay scales. True nerds can read the paper here, but a readable summary is available here.<\/p>\n<p>Why It Matters<\/p>\n<p>In short, <span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> was good for students and good for high-performing teachers.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> helped higher-performing teachers get paid more.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cTeachers with higher\u2026contributions to the growth in student achievement\u2026started earning more in flexible-pay districts. School and district administrators appear to be able to identify an effective teacher when they see one.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> helped higher-paying districts attract higher-performing teachers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cTeachers who moved to a flexible-pay district after a collective bargaining agreement expired were more than a standard deviation more effective, on average, than teachers who moved to the same districts before the expiration. The effectiveness of teachers moving to seniority-pay districts, on the other hand, did not change, and these teachers did not experience any change in pay.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> helped higher-performing teachers get paid better earlier in their careers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201c[Teachers who moved to a flexible-pay district] also had lower seniority and academic credentials and enjoyed a significant pay increase upon moving.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> helped students\u2019 test scores in districts that used it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cOverall, changes in the composition and effort of the teaching workforce led to a 5 percent of a standard deviation increase in student test scores in flexible-pay districts relative to seniority-pay districts in the five years following the reform.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> made it harder for lower-funded districts to compete for teaching talent, but better state funding could mitigate it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026A district with a smaller budget and a larger share of economically disadvantaged students may have to pay too high a premium, which it cannot afford. The district may thus decide to stay with seniority pay to at least be able to fill its teaching slots. \u2026We also show, however, that properly designed bonus programs that redistribute state funds to districts serving large numbers of disadvantaged students could offset this effect.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> did create a short-term retirement shock, but districts that used it got their lower-performing teachers to retire.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cTeachers who left flexible-pay districts were far less effective than those who left seniority-pay districts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> did create a short-term retirement shock, but it helped policymakers learn that benefits, not salaries, are the best path to fiscal soundness.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cI find that approximately 45% of the increase in retirement can be attributed to the decline in net salaries, whereas 55% can be ascribed to the fall in gross salaries and pension benefits. \u2026Shifting part of [teachers\u2019] lifetime compensation away from retirement towards employment (i.e., raising salaries and making pensions less generous) could significantly improve teacher retention.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span> was especially beneficial to male teachers, who are a minority in Wisconsin schools.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn schools with a female principal or districts with a female superintendent, the gap is virtually zero. In schools and districts run by men, the gap is substantial. \u2026The third possible explanation is higher demand for male teachers from certain schools, for example those employing fewer men, those that lost male teachers immediately before <span class=\"il\">Act<\/span> <span class=\"il\">10<\/span>, and those enrolling a higher share of male students.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The Quote<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cNon-partisan analysis confirms what Wisconsin taxpayers know: Act 10 gave public school districts the freedom to reward the best teachers they have and drive student achievement. Rolling those reforms back would be costly to school districts, high-performing educators, and, most of all, students.\u201d \u2013 CJ Szafir, CEO, Institute for Reforming Government<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>What\u2019s Next<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Another lawsuit is seeking to overturn Act 10, likely due to a more favorable Supreme Court. The suit will take months to find its way to court.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>About IRG\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The Institute for Reforming Government is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization that seeks to simplify government at every level by offering policy solutions to thought leaders in American government in the areas of tax reform, government inefficiency, and burdensome regulations.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at https:\/\/reforminggovernment.org\/explain-it-to-me-non-partisan-act-10-research-good-for-kids-good-for-high-performing-teachers\/ Explain It to Me: Non-Partisan Act 10 Research: Good&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":3264,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-institute-for-reforming-government"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10362"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10362\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10363,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10362\/revisions\/10363"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}