{"id":1627,"date":"2023-03-28T17:22:27","date_gmt":"2023-03-28T17:22:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=1627"},"modified":"2023-03-28T17:37:52","modified_gmt":"2023-03-28T17:37:52","slug":"appeals-court-said-janet-protasiewicz-made-errors-in-co-sleeping-death-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=1627","title":{"rendered":"Appeals Court Said Janet Protasiewicz Made Errors in Co-Sleeping Death Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wisconsinrightnow.com\/vaylan-g-morris\/\">https:\/\/www.wisconsinrightnow.com\/vaylan-g-morris\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In 2019, a Wisconsin appeals court <a href=\"https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/wisconsin\/court-of-appeals\/2019\/2018ap001694-cr.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ruled that <\/a>liberal Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz made serious errors when she sentenced an African-American Milwaukee man, Vaylan Morris, in a co-sleeping case. The court reversed Protasiewicz and ordered a new sentencing for the man.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, the court found that Protasiewicz relied on inaccurate information presented by the prosecutor at sentencing <a href=\"https:\/\/wcca.wicourts.gov\/caseDetail.html;jsessionid=20A3258A2AB4A8EE49D4C0DDC5A60BE8.render4?caseNo=2016CF003043&amp;countyNo=40&amp;mode=details\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">and sentenced Morris<\/a> based on claims that were not even in the evidence.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201ctrial court\u2019s inference that a different medical examiner would have come to a different conclusion regarding cause of death is inconsistent with, and unsupported by, the record,\u201d the appeals court wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The record demonstrates \u201cthat the court never considered any other possible cause of death, such as sudden infant death syndrome,\u201d and Protasiewicz\u2019s statements \u201cconflict with the autopsy findings, which stated that a cause of death could not be determined,\u201d the appeals court found, listing Protasiewicz\u2019s errors.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_103370\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-103370\" style=\"width: 271px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-103370\" src=\"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/morris-271x300-1.jpg\" alt=\"vaylan morris\" width=\"271\" height=\"300\" title=\"\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-103370\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Vaylan morris.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Although the medical examiner said the child\u2019s cause of death could not be determined, Protasiewicz commented that a hypothetical other medical examiner might rule differently, even though there was nothing to support this in the record at all, the appeals court found.<\/p>\n<p>The decision was authored by Judge William Brash who, in 2021, was named chief judge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n<p>The case involved a man named Vaylan G. Morris, who appealed his conviction of second-degree recklessly endangering safety as a party to a crime. He was appealing Protasiewicz\u2019s order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing on the grounds that she used inaccurate information at sentencing.<\/p>\n<p>Morris was charged after his infant daughter died after co-sleeping with Morris and the child\u2019s mother Monica Gonzalez.<\/p>\n<p>The cause of death was not determined, the appeals court decision says. Morris admitted to smoking synthetic marijuana prior to co-sleeping with the child and thought he might have rolled over on her. The child had synthetic marijuana in her stomach, but it was not determined to have caused her death.<\/p>\n<p>In his postconviction motion, Morris argued that Protasiewicz relied on inaccurate information regarding O.M.\u2019s cause fo death. Specifically, the state represented at sentencing that the synthetic marijuana could have been the cause of death, but the medical examiner had advised the state that the ingested synthetic marijuana was <em>not<\/em> the cause of death.<\/p>\n<p>Protasiewicz denied Morris\u2019s motion, stating that the information presented by the state was not necessarily inaccurate just because it conflicted with the medical examiner\u2019s opinion, even though the state conceded that point. Protasiewicz also stated that she had not relied on the inaccurate information because the sentence imposed was not based on a particular theory of the cause of death and thus any error relating to that inaccurate information was harmless.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court disagreed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe disagree. The record demonstrates that after the inaccurate information was presented by the state, the trial court repeatedly referred to Morris and Gonzalez as having caused O.M.\u2019s death during Morris\u2019s sentencing hearing. Furthermore, the record does not reflect that the court considered any other possible causes of death. We therefore reverse and remand this matter for resentencing,\u201d the court found.<\/p>\n<p>Gonzalez said Morris was so \u201cf*cked up\u201d after smoking the synthetic marijuana that he had fallen on the floor. He was on extended supervision because of a previous criminal conviction for burglary.<\/p>\n<p>Detectable levels of synthetic marijuana were found in the child\u2019s stomach and inside a baby bottle\u2019s residue. The drug had not circulated through the child\u2019s bloodstream or nervous system so the doctor concluded the child\u2019s possible ingestion of the drug \u201cdid not play a role in her death.\u201d The autopsy showed no signs of suffocation or any sign that either parent had laid over her body, causing her death.<\/p>\n<p>The doctor suggested that co-sleeping could have played a role in the child\u2019s death because sudden infant death occurs more frequently in cases of co-sleeping but \u201cit is not necessarily related to suffocation.\u201d The cause of death could not be determined.<\/p>\n<p>Morris pleaded guilty and the state recommended he spend time in prison but did not recommend how long.<br \/>\nDuring the sentencing hearing, when Protasiewicz asked how the child could have died if she wasn\u2019t suffocated, the state responded, the \u201csynthetic marijuana in the child\u2019s system.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The court called it a horrible horrible completely preventable situation and said that the child \u201cwould be alive and well today if you and her mother had not engaged in the reckless criminal conduct the two of you chose to engage in.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The court observed, \u201cthen we\u2019ve got all this synthetic marijuana in (the child\u2019s system). So not only could you have suffocated her \u2013 you certainly had been negligent enough.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When Morris asked for probation to \u201cpay respects to her grave,\u201d Protasiewicz said, \u201cYou want to visit her grave. You know (the) two of you killed her. I don\u2019t even know how you think you have the right to do that and continue to grieve.\u201d She also referred to the death as a \u201ccompletely preventable tragedy that the two of you caused,\u201d and gave Morris four years in prison and five years of extended supervision, records show.<\/p>\n<p>Morris appealed saying the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing.<\/p>\n<p>The state conceded the information was inaccurate. Protasiewicz denied the resentencing motion saying that even though the state \u201cmisquoted\u201d the conclusion on synthetic marijuana playing a role in the death it was \u201cnot necessarily inaccurate\u201d because \u201cdifferent medical examiners can disagree about the cause of death,\u201d according to the decision.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court noted, though, that the doctor had submitted an affidavit in support of the postconviction motion stating that \u201cwithin a degree of medical certainty\u201d the synthetic marijuana was not a cause of her death, and there was no other report or opinion submitted by any other medical examiner or other expert advancing a different conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>Protasiewicz argued she had not relied on any particular theory of the cause of death but the appeals court found that the trial court\u2019s remarks \u201cclearly indicate its belief that Morris caused the death of O.M.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The defendant \u201cmet his burden showing that the court relied on that inaccurate information at sentencing,\u201d the appeals court wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Protasiewicz found the error was harmless, but, again, the appeals court disagreed with her.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court ruled that Protasiewicz\u2019s statement was not harmless because she said, \u201ceven if (O.M.\u2019s) death could be attributed to some other factor\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The error was not harmless. The inaccurate information presented by the state \u201ccontributed to the sentence,\u201d the appeals court wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Today Morris is in Racine Correctional Institution with a<\/p>\n<p>Before Brash, PJ, Kessler and Dugan, JJ.<br \/>\nBrash, PJ.<br \/>\n2019<br \/>\nRacine CI<br \/>\nMandatory release date 5\/22\/23<br \/>\nOn 2.5.2020 he was released on extended supervision (DCC hold, back in)<br \/>\nFred Rosa gave him 3 years 123 days in prison and 5 years extended supervision. No contact\/care for children under the age of 12<br \/>\nFour years, five es<br \/>\nRosa modified to three years and 163 days<br \/>\nA year later allowed contact with 12 yr old daughter<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at https:\/\/www.wisconsinrightnow.com\/vaylan-g-morris\/ In 2019, a Wisconsin appeals court ruled that liberal&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":1629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-wi-right-now"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1627"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1631,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1627\/revisions\/1631"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}