{"id":16925,"date":"2025-07-03T18:46:37","date_gmt":"2025-07-03T18:46:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=16925"},"modified":"2025-07-03T18:57:24","modified_gmt":"2025-07-03T18:57:24","slug":"wisconsins-retirement-income-exclusion-will-shift-tax-burdens-to-working-families-over-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=16925","title":{"rendered":"Wisconsin\u2019s retirement income exclusion will shift tax burdens to working families over time"},"content":{"rendered":"

This post originally appeared at https:\/\/www.badgerinstitute.org\/wisconsins-retirement-income-exclusion-will-shift-tax-burdens-to-working-families-over-time\/<\/a><\/p>\n

With Republican legislative leaders and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers having reached and passed a budget deal for Wisconsin\u2019s 2025-27 biennium (fiscal years 2026 and 2027), it is worth examining two significant tax relief proposals Republicans included in their plan.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The more costly of the two provisions, reducing individual income tax collections by an estimated $695 million over two years, is a significant increase in the amount of retirement income that is excluded from income taxes for Wisconsin seniors. The next most expensive provision, reducing collections by an estimated $643 million over the biennium, expands the amount of income that falls within Wisconsin\u2019s second-lowest bracket.<\/p>\n

If the goal of the bracket threshold change is to provide tax relief to lower- and middle-income Wisconsinites, expanding the amount of income that is exposed to the lower 4.4 percent rate, rather than the 5.3 percent rate, is a relatively well-structured way to accomplish that goal. However, the expanded retirement income exclusion will undermine the tax code\u2019s neutrality and shift burdens onto working families over time, while yielding far less \u201cbang for the buck\u201d than other more pro-growth reforms.<\/p>\n

Retirement income exclusion<\/h4>\n

Republicans\u2019 proposal, passed by the Legislature and signed by Evers early Thursday morning, substantially expands Wisconsin\u2019s retirement income exclusion by increasing the maximum exclusion amount from $5,000 to $24,000 for single filers and from $10,000 to $48,000 for married couples filing jointly. While eligibility is limited to those who are at least 67 years of age, up from 65 years of age, the exclusion is no longer income-tested.<\/p>\n

While well-intentioned as a way to provide tax relief to retirees facing financial strain and to help Wisconsinites stay in Wisconsin, the measure goes far beyond that by wiping out income tax liability altogether for many retirees and by substantially reducing income tax liability for even the affluent.<\/p>\n

Imagine a married couple with $60,000 in non-Social Security retirement income. Under current law, this couple would be ineligible to claim Wisconsin\u2019s income-tested retirement income exclusion of $10,000 because their federal adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds $30,000. If they claim Wisconsin\u2019s standard deduction ($18,823 in tax year 2025 for a couple with $60,000 in Wisconsin income) and personal exemptions ($1,900 for a married couple with both individuals ages 65 or over), their Wisconsin taxable income would be $39,277, and their total income tax liability would be approximately $1,553 under Wisconsin\u2019s current rate schedule.<\/p>\n

Under the just-passed measure, if this couple takes at least $48,000 in distributions from qualifying retirement accounts, this would reduce their Wisconsin income to only $12,000. After claiming the standard deduction, they would have $0 in taxable income and would not be required to pay any income taxes to Wisconsin.<\/p>\n

A separate retired couple with $100,000 in federal AGI would have only $52,000 in Wisconsin income once the $48,000 retirement income exclusion is claimed. Since Wisconsin\u2019s sliding-scale standard deduction varies based on a taxpayer\u2019s Wisconsin income after exclusions are applied, the retirement income exclusion would enable this couple to claim a higher standard deduction than they would have been able to claim otherwise. Specifically, they would be able to claim a $20,405 standard deduction and a $1,900 personal exemption, reducing their Wisconsin taxable income to $29,695. Under both Wisconsin\u2019s old and just-passed rate schedules, this would yield a tax liability of approximately $1,130.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, a working-age couple with $100,000 in federal AGI would be eligible to claim a standard deduction of only $10,911, reducing their taxable income to $87,689 once their $1,400 personal exemption is applied. Under Wisconsin\u2019s old income tax rates, this would yield an income tax liability of approximately $4,119. Under the budget\u2019s new rate schedule with the expanded 4.4 percent bracket, this would yield a liability of approximately $3,866. As such, under either the old brackets or the new schedule, the working-age taxpayers making $100,000 would pay roughly three-and-a-half times more than the retired taxpayers despite having the same amount of annual income.<\/p>\n

Such a large retirement income exclusion injects significant non-neutrality into Wisconsin\u2019s tax code, extending preferential treatment to older Wisconsinites over working-age individuals and families. Such a sharp tax cut for retirees, including those with comfortable retirement savings and additional accrued wealth, will, over time, put upward pressure on the income tax rates that would apply to the narrower base of primarily working-age Wisconsinites. This could create an incentive for more seniors to move to Wisconsin from other states to take advantage of this preferential treatment, putting additional strain on state coffers, even as working-age Wisconsinites may become more likely to relocate to low- or no-income-tax states.<\/p>\n

It is important to keep in mind, especially when thinking about income incurred in retirement, that annual income alone is not a sufficient proxy for wealth or ability to pay. Some retirees take relatively modest annual distributions from their retirement accounts while retaining other high-value assets, such as vacation properties or other non-retirement account investments. Furthermore, after saving and investing for decades, many older Americans are actually better able to afford state income tax payments than their working-age children, friends, and neighbors who haven\u2019t yet accrued many assets and are still working to pay down student loans and mortgages.<\/p>\n

Additionally, while reducing (and in some cases eliminating) income taxes on retirees gives them more capacity for additional consumption, which could have a positive effect on sales tax revenues, a large retirement income exclusion is far less likely to promote long-term economic growth in Wisconsin than income tax relief \u2014 especially income tax rate reductions \u2014 that reduce the burden on economic growth-inducing activities like labor and investment.<\/p>\n

Instead of substantially expanding the retirement income exclusion, policymakers should instead have reduced income tax rates or otherwise made the income tax code friendlier for all taxpayers, including retirees as well as members of Wisconsin\u2019s current workforce. To the extent Wisconsin policymakers wish to further relieve tax burdens for fixed-income individuals who are truly struggling to make ends meet, policymakers could consider making additional age- and\/or income-tested provisions more generous. A more reasonable, targeted solution would be to modestly increase the income threshold for the existing $5,000 per person retirement income exclusion, and perhaps index it to inflation, to ensure more claimants actually benefit from it.<\/p>\n

Expansion of second-lowest individual income tax bracket<\/h4>\n

In addition to substantially expanding the retirement income exclusion, Republicans\u2019 tax plan as passed provides individual income tax relief to lower- and middle-income taxpayers by expanding Wisconsin\u2019s second-lowest individual income tax bracket, retroactively effective as of tax year 2025. Specifically, the measure applies the 4.4 percent rate, rather than the 5.3 percent rate, to an additional $21,110 in taxable income for single filers and an additional $28,150 in taxable income for married couples filing jointly, as shown in the table below.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Click to enlarge<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

This change is a structurally sound way to provide individual income tax relief to lower- and middle-income taxpayers. Until this budget, Wisconsin\u2019s second-highest individual income tax rate of 5.3 percent kicked in at only $29,370 in taxable income for single filers and $39,150 for married couples filing jointly. As such, a large number of lower-income Wisconsinites were exposed to Wisconsin\u2019s second-highest rate. Specifically, Wisconsin until now imposed a higher marginal income tax rate on $30,000 in taxable income for single filers than is imposed in all but 10 states (Delaware, Hawaii, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia) and the District of Columbia.<\/p>\n

Katherine Loughead is a senior policy analyst and research manager with the Center for State Tax Policy at the Tax Foundation and author of the Badger Institute\u2019s\u202fTax Reform Options to Improve Wisconsin\u2019s Competitiveness.<\/em><\/p>\n

This is an updated version of <\/em>a brief<\/em><\/a> published July 2 by the Tax Foundation. Published with permission of the Tax Foundation.<\/em><\/p>\n

Submit a comment<\/h2>\n

\t\t\t\t#wpforms-55718.wpforms-block-467e6d66-8982-4d3e-8dd7-f7c56ebf3a1f {
\n\t\t\t\t–wpforms-button-background-color: #9e1b2c;
\n–wpforms-field-size-input-height: 43px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-input-spacing: 15px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-font-size: 16px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-line-height: 19px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-padding-h: 14px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-checkbox-size: 16px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-sublabel-spacing: 5px;
\n–wpforms-field-size-icon-size: 1;
\n–wpforms-label-size-font-size: 16px;
\n–wpforms-label-size-line-height: 19px;
\n–wpforms-label-size-sublabel-font-size: 14px;
\n–wpforms-label-size-sublabel-line-height: 17px;
\n–wpforms-button-size-font-size: 20px;
\n–wpforms-button-size-height: 48px;
\n–wpforms-button-size-padding-h: 20px;
\n–wpforms-button-size-margin-top: 15px;
\n–wpforms-container-shadow-size-box-shadow: none;<\/p>\n

\t\t\t}<\/p>\n

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.<\/p>\n
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.<\/div>\n
\n
\n\t\t\t