{"id":4160,"date":"2023-07-10T15:02:54","date_gmt":"2023-07-10T15:02:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=4160"},"modified":"2023-07-10T16:05:04","modified_gmt":"2023-07-10T16:05:04","slug":"significant-something-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/?p=4160","title":{"rendered":"Significant Something Revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at <a href=\"https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/radio\/significant-something-revisited\/\">https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/radio\/significant-something-revisited\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>2023 | Week of July 10 | Radio Transcript #1524<\/h3>\n<p>(This commentary is an updated version of a commentary that aired the week of January 16, 2023.)<\/p>\n<p>Poverty. It seems every politician wants to address it and has ideas for how to alleviate it. Often those ideas involve giving people more money through government hand-out programs.<\/p>\n<p>Poverty is certainly an issue a compassionate society should pay attention to, especially since poverty so often is generational, meaning if one generation is in poverty, it\u2019s likely that succeeding generations will be, unless something significant happens to break the cycle. Giving more welfare doesn\u2019t constitute something significant; unfortunately, too often, that approach entrenches poverty.<\/p>\n<p>But there is a significant something that can break the cycle and is almost fool-proof in ensuring that a person or even a family avoids poverty. Research done by the Brookings Institute shows that there are three steps, if done in order, result in avoiding poverty in the vast majority of people, regardless of ethnicity, race, or economic background.<\/p>\n<p>Brookings calls this the \u201cSuccess Sequence,\u201d which consists of graduate high school, get a full-time job, and get married before having children. According to Institute for Family Studies, [quote] \u201c<strong>the\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ifstudies.org\/ifs-admin\/resources\/reports\/successsequencedisadvantagedya-final.pdf\">latest research<\/a><strong>\u00a0shows that 97% of young people who follow all three steps are not poor\u00a0as adults\u2026<\/strong>.In comparison, half of adults in their 30s who missed all three steps (52%)\u00a0are in poverty.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/radio\/significant-something-revisited\/#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a>[end quote]<\/p>\n<p>Organizationally, we would add a couple of subpoints in the sequence. First, thoroughly vet the person you are thinking of marrying. Doing so can help to ensure a marriage that will go the distance. Second, once you are married, do everything you can to stay married to that person, especially if there are children involved. We think these subpoints are important, but even without them, the Success Sequence has the basic essentials.<\/p>\n<p>That said, given the numbers from the research, one would think politicians concerned about poverty would be all over the Success Sequence, funding it and promoting it widely. But that\u2019s not the case.<\/p>\n<p>In Governor Walker\u2019s last budget in 2017, he proposed putting a modest $1 million towards promoting the Success Sequence in public schools and in the public square.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, in spite of the solid research, the obvious need, and the reasonable amount of money, the Republican-led state legislature removed all funding for the \u201cSuccess Sequence\u201d in the final version of the budget that they passed and the governor signed into law. This was extremely short-sighted and would mean more taxpayer money going to government welfare programs since more people would be in poverty.<\/p>\n<p>As I thought about why the Republicans scratched funding for this proven anti-poverty sequence, I realized it wasn\u2019t the money. I think it\u2019s the sequence itself\u2014not the first two steps, but the last one that too many of them struggled with. That step is certainly the one that liberals object to, and I\u2019ve come to believe many conservatives do as well. The majority of Republicans today are uncomfortable asserting that child-bearing should be within marriage. That sounds too much like making a \u201cmoral judgment\u201d for many of them.<\/p>\n<p>This year, Governor Evers presented a budget that did not mention the \u201cSuccess Sequence.\u201d Unfortunately, the budget the Republicans recently passed and gave the governor and which he signed into law, didn\u2019t mention the \u201cSuccess Sequence\u201d either. This was once again short-sighted and an opportunity missed, even if they believed\u2014and probably rightly believed\u2014that Governor Evers would veto the funding. However, putting it in the budget at least would have shown good faith about the Success Sequence and allowed for a robust discussion of the issue.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine the difference in this state over even the next ten years, if more and more young people get the message that they can avoid poverty and pretty much live the American dream if they finish high school, get a full-time job, and marry before having children. But many young people will never hear about the Success Sequence because too few people talk about it, and the state hasn\u2019t devoted any resources to it.<\/p>\n<p>Even though the state continues to ignore the research and opts out of promoting the Success Sequence, we can teach and share the sequence with the young people in our sphere of influence, especially since the Success Sequence is basically God\u2019s plan\u2014get educated and trained, work, and marry before having children. As always, God\u2019s way really is the best way. Doing life His way is the significant something that can break a generational poverty cycle.<\/p>\n<p>This is Julaine Appling for Wisconsin Family Council reminding you the Prophet Hosea said, \u201cMy people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/radio\/significant-something-revisited\/#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ifstudies.org\/success-sequence\">https:\/\/ifstudies.org\/success-sequence<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Learn more at <a href=\"https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/\">WIFamilyCouncil.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post originally appeared at https:\/\/wifamilycouncil.org\/radio\/significant-something-revisited\/ 2023 | Week of July 10 | Radio Transcript&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-wfc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4160"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4161,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4160\/revisions\/4161"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wifamily.news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}